December 20, 2010

Change of Perspective
Throughout this course our class has been greatly encouraged to consider the perspective in which the story is told and especially how it affects the way in which the reader perceives it.  When an author writes the story from only one character’s perspective, it can severely limit what the reader can derive from the story as a whole.  The reader can only know what the character who is telling the story knows.  That means that the reader can never be completely aware what other character’s are thinking/feeling and what they’re true intentions are.  The author could enlighten the reader through the main character at some point but perhaps the author wants the reader to remain in the dark.  Their could be any number of reasons as to why a mystery is placed in a story but then goes unanswered; it is not necessarily the author’s lack of attention or indolence.
A good example of a story that is written from only one character’s perspective and therefore leaves many questions unanswered to the reader is Carmilla by Joseph Sheridan Le Fanu.  He wrote Carmilla in the perspective of Laura, the victim, but because of the way Carmilla is vanquished there are many questions about incidences in the book that are left unanswered.  For example: who are the people in the carriage that leave Carmilla with Laura, especially the “mother”?  Who is the frightening black woman that does not get out of the carriage, even though it was tipped on its side and why does she appear to be angry?
Most likely Le Fanu left these questions unanswered for Laura because it makes the story more mysterious. Throughout the book Laura’s story is intimidating and this mysterious ending goes well with the sinister feel the book invokes in the reader.  The story is also more realistic because while an ending where everything is answered and accounted for is ideal that is not real life.  Books that end in a way where everything is answered give the impression to reader that in the end all questions are answered but is that real life?  In the case of the character Laura it is not because it is state that she has included everything she knows and the “person” Carmilla.  At the beginning of Carmilla Dr. Hesselius writes this not about Laura’s account of her experience with Carmilla.  “She, probably, could have added little to the Narrative which she communicates in the following pages, with, so far as I can pronounce, such conscientious particularity.”
How much more interesting would the story be, though, if Carmilla’s side were accounted for?  What light and understanding would it shed on the story Laura has already told but has also left many incidences to the imagination of the reader?  It just so happens that Carmilla, or Mircalla, Countess Karnstein, as she is truly known, did recount her experience with Laura and part of her story was discovered after much intense searching; although it is believed that not all of her accounts were found.  Below are all the accounts from Mircalla that could be found thus far and it has been put into a similar style as to how Carmilla was composed by Le Fanu.

Carmilla’s Account
Prologue: The Visit

I have waited many years to find her.  I knew that once I saw her it would be plain that she was the one.  My family is ancient and strong, but the lineage that has followed me has left more to be desired than I can describe.  I have visited the women of my line for the last fifty years and when I do find her I will place on her the same blessing that I have been given; the gift of eternal life.  I have decided to visit her.  I have observed her from afar since she was an infant and I am convinced that it is her I have been waiting for.  Upon my many observations I have learned that her name is Laura.  Why Laura you might ask?  It is nothing that can be put into words, this feeling I get when I observe her.  I simply know to the core of my being that she should be my mate; that she was meant to spend eternity by my side.  She will feel the same way I am sure.
I came into her room the first time while she was asleep.  I kept hidden as she awoke from her slumber but when she began to weep I made my presence known to her.  She was only a child of six yet she was not afraid as you might expect any child to be.  She regarded me with interest and did not pull away when first I touched her.  I soothed her gently and joined her on the bed, where soon after she fell asleep in my arms.  I knew she was the one I was waiting for and so I marked her.  I let myself transform into my other nature and I glided back towards the bed, drew the collar of her nightgown back slightly, and struck!  The response from the child was immediate and dramatic.  Her eyes flew open, she shrieked and I was gone.
I have only a few years now to wait before I can claim her.  I know she felt the connection, as I did, and I know she will remember me when again I come into her life.

Preparation
Madame Sheridan said it was a mistake to visit Laura, and perhaps she was right, but there was no helping it.  I had to see her close up, had to know her and mark her as my own.  Madame knew, even though I had not shared it with her yet, that I would one day return to Laura.  She asked, “What will you do when she does recognize you, for surely she will not forget such a trying occurrence.”
I did not respond for to give Madame too much information on the subject of Laura would prove disastrous.  I needed her.  For now anyway.  She must not know my obsession with finding a true mate because she would then know that I plan on one day leaving her and I am sure she would not bear that truth well.  So for now I keep quiet, make my plans and let Madame know only what she needs to know.
While I waited to join Laura I made my preparations.  Carefully I explained to Madame that we needed to appear like gentry.  This would not be a difficult feat for Madame since before I had transformed her she was an aristocratic lady herself; indeed we are at this moment living in her estate house.  Madame was not surprised at my declaration to appear genteel since this is how we usually manipulated persons of quality to take me into their home.  We normally used some extreme pretense that would not allow Madame to stay but would require me too, and I saw no reason why this same scheme to deposit myself into Laura’s home would not work just as smoothly.  The only problem is the schloss in which Laura resided was very secluded and the residents even more so.  This meant that I must arrive by carriage and I must devise a plan to get the attention of the residents and a plausible reason for me to remain behind, while Madame continued on.
For my charade I needed men.  Madame and I must appear genteel which means we shall need a full entourage of footmen and horsemen in noble liveries.  Also there was the issue of what to do with Bess for Madame is so attached to her, although for what reasons I do not know, that she will not go anywhere without her.  Madame had taken such a liking for Bess that I could not understand, for she is quite demented, although perhaps this may be from shock of being in Madame’s company, for she regularly feeds on Bess and is not always so successful in controlling her.  I have tried to teach Madame how to feed without alerting her prey, but she never seems able to apply this skill, and usually the outcome is similar to Bess’ behaviors; complete lack of sanity after a period of time.  Normally I do not concern myself with Madame’s conquests but since Bess could possibly foil my plans of being positioned into Laura’s home I must figure out what to do with her.  I suppose she must go, for Madame will be most disagreeable if I say Bess cannot, but I will stress firmly that Bess must stay out of sight for what would I do if anyone does see?  Her presence would be difficult to explain since the very nature of her appearance would be quite frightening to a person.
My plans are set and ready.  I approach Madame and tell her we must again deposit myself in the presence of humans, in a very similar fashion as before, for I am in need of sustenance which can not be provided any other way.  I tell her I have found such a place and though she looks surprised at the location and isolation of the place she does not question me for she knows better.  She knows it is Laura I will be visiting, and she will soon realize that this one is very different from the others if I am not careful.  I tell her of the plan, which is very similar to past plans, and we ready the carriage and the men.  Since the footmen are so young and weak they are much easier for me to handle than Madame, who I must manipulate more and more as she gets stronger.  When I have safely deposited myself in the house I will dispose of them all, since I have told them all to wait for further instructions from me at a designated spot a few miles past the schloss.  I know that Madame will cause problems for me if I do not deal with her soon; she suspects that this Laura is different.  The males will not prove to be a problem but I have no need for them and if I set them free they will only cause disaster and inquiry in the surrounding villages. 
The Guest
My plan is set into motion.  We are very close now to the schloss and it takes all my power to hide my anticipation from Madame.  The carriage ride is rough and jarring which, of course, does not bother Madame or myself, but Bess seems to get more and more agitated at each collision with a rock or rut.  I give Madame a look and she instantly tries to soothe Bess and keep her quiet.
We are approaching the schloss now.  I close my eyes and sit so still that I could be asleep, but of course I am not.  The carriage begins to speed up quickly but the only one that appears startled is Bess.  Shortly the carriage is at such an alarming speed that it rocks back and forth frighteningly.  Bess begins to make noise and I open my eyes, look at Bess and she is instantly quiet.  There!  I can smell her. She is close!  I close my eyes again and the horses rear and the carriage falls to its side.  As it falls I let out a long drawn out scream that seems, for a moment, to surprise Madame.  All the occupants of the carriage are jostled and tossed violently but, of course, Madame and I are unaffected.  Bess appears to not even have noticed the carriage tipping but I know once the trance has broken, which will be soon, she will be in pain and most likely angry.  I pray the trance will hold until the carriage is on its way again and I am safely deposited into Laura’s home.
The liveried footmen do as they were instructed before the carriage left and lift me carefully out of the carriage; I appear to be stunned to all who view me.  Madame had already removed herself and was being consoled by the master of the schloss.  The remaining footmen quickly and expertly right the carriage and prepare to leave immediately.  Madame carries out the plan although she gives me some fright when she displays less than motherly affection on me.  Still, the plan works for the most part and in no time at all she has arranged for me to reside at the schloss until she can return for me, which, of course, she never will.
My plan is finally set into motion and soon Laura will be mine, and I hers.

My Goal
My goal for this project was to have a similar writing style as Le Fanu but to create a darker feeling for the reader and really give the reader the impression that Carmilla is passionate about Laura but also heartless about who she must use to get to Laura.  I wanted to answer many questions that went unanswered, but in such a way that the questions weren’t just plain answered; the reader is given more information on parts in Carmilla that were very murky but they must still come to there own conclusion.  The majority of my basis for my addition to Le Fanu’s Carmilla was from the scene where the carriage crashes and Carmilla is left with Laura and her father.  Here is a passage that gave me a great amount of inspiration for my project.
            “At this moment the unwonted sound of carriage wheels and many hoofs upon the road, arrested our attention.
            They seemed to be approaching from the high ground overlooking the bridge, and very soon the equipage emerged from that point.  Two horsemen first crossed the bridge, then came a carriage drawn by four horses, and two men rode behind.
            It seemed to be the traveling carriage of a person of rank; and we were al immediately absorbed in watching that very unusual spectacle.  It became, in a few moments, greatly more interesting, for just as the carriage had passed the summit of the steep bridge, one of the leaders, taking fright, communicated his panic to the rest, and after a plunge or two, the whole team broke into a wild gallop together, and dashing between the horsemen who rode in front, came thundering along the road towards us with the speed of a hurricane.
            The excitement of the scene was made more painful by the clear, long-drawn screams of a female voice from the carriage window.” (Carmilla)

This whole process seems so elaborate to set up Carmilla into Laura’s house that I thought an actual explanation for such drastic measures would make the story more interesting.  The passage I wrote also explains the women in the carriage, along with the frightening footmen and horsemen.  I wanted to hint at the fact that Madame Sheridan (the name being a tribute to Le Fanu) and the footmen and horsemen were all vampires, but I also wanted the reader to be left somewhat in the dark about it too so that the story is still mysterious, like Le Fanu’s.  I got the idea to make them all vampires, except for Bess (the frightening black woman) because of Le Fanu’s description of them in Carmilla.
            “’Did you remark a woman in the carriage, after it was set up again, who did not get out,’ inquired Mademoiselle, ‘but only looked from the window?’
            … Then she described a hideous black woman, with a sort of colored turban on her head, and who was gazing all the time from the carriage window, nodding and grinning derisively towards the ladies, with gleaming eyes and large white eyeballs, and her teeth set as if in fury.
            ‘Did you remark what an ill-looking pack of men the servants were?’ asked Madame.
            … ‘Besides looking wicked, their faces were so strangely lean, and dark, and sullen.  I am very curious, I own…’” (Carmilla)

I felt that my passage went somewhat smoothly although it was difficult for me to get all of my ideas that I had from reading Carmilla into the passage that I wrote.  A lot of times it was hard to figure out how to word it.  For the most part I think that I accomplished my task.  I wanted the story to tell Carmilla’s side of the story but I also wanted it to be mysterious like Le Fanu was.  I still want the reader to be able to use their imagination about what I wrote because I think it makes the story more realistic.  Carmilla would not explain everything that would happen to her in detail because she is not writing this for anyone to read; therefore it must be written down as if they are Carmilla’s thoughts on the subject.
I really enjoyed doing this project.  Once I am given an idea on something to write about I tend to run away with it.  I pretty much wrote this straight through and changed very little from the first draft.  Usually when I write I think about it for a long time until I figure out what I want to write.  Then I’ll sit down and write everything out.  I usually do not change much after that.  I had fun with the style of writing I was trying to attempt, which was to make Carmilla’s story believable by writing the passage how it most likely would have been written in that time period.  I was trying to make it similar, but not an exact copy, of Le Fanu’s writing.  One part of my passage that I particularly liked was the one that showed Carmilla’s powers and the control she possessed. 
            “We are approaching the schloss now.  I close my eyes and sit so still that I could be asleep, but of course I am not.  The carriage begins to speed up quickly but the only one that appears startled is Bess.  Shortly the carriage is at such an alarming speed that it rocks back and forth frighteningly.  Bess begins to make noise and I open my eyes, look at Bess and she is instantly quiet.  There!  I can smell her. She is close!  I close my eyes again and the horses rear and the carriage falls to its side.  As it falls I let out a long drawn out scream that seems, for a moment, to surprise Madame.”
Overall the project went smoothly.  I enjoyed the book so much that it was very interesting to try to recreate it the way I did.  I hope that I at least did Le Fanu justice with my passage, although I do feel that since he leaves so much to the imagination, I could have really gone in any direction I chose.  I did use part of my post from my blog titled “The Visit” because it was a good set up for the rest of my passage, but I did change it slightly.  I felt it could be polished up a little bit and I wanted it to flow really well with the rest of my passage.  To really make sure I had an understanding of the book I did reread a lot of Carmilla and I don’t think that any part of my passage would not coincide with Le Fanu’s book.

December 17, 2010

Reflection

First off I just want to say how much I enjoyed this class.  I wasn't really sure what to think when I found out that it was about vampires, but that didn't really put me off of the class either.  I thought it would actually make it more interesting and I like reading all different kinds of books as well.  What I really enjoyed though was reading the books with a class just because it really helps to bring things into perspective and hash things out.
The novel that I liked the best was probably Wuthering Heights, which actually really surprises me because I had already read the book and I did not really care for it.  That just shows that reading it with a group and having a purpose while reading the book really makes a difference.  The main reason I love this book though is because the characters are so tragically flawed.  They're so real and gritty.  It also reminds me of Jane Eyre which is my favorite book.  I also really liked I Am Legend.  I was not expecting to like it as much as I did and I especially liked the end.
I've read several vampire books before taking this class but I never really viewed it the way I do now.  It's easier to see the contrasts between the human characters and the vampires.  I also feel like I recognize the perspective and its importance to the story more.  This is actually what my final paper will be about based on the book Carmilla.
I thought the way the class was set up with the blogs what a neat idea.  For the most part it seem to work well and in a lot of ways it was much easier than using D2L.  The one part that did bother me was that you weren't notified if someone commented on your comment on someone else's blog, and it really isn't discussion friendly.  Which brings me to the class being online.  Obviously this could not be changed because that is the course we signed up for but it would have been so nice to have a face-to-face discussion with everyone because everyone seemed to have such great ideas and seemed very interested in all the readings.  I think it would have been a lot of fun.  One of my favorite classes was Womens Lit.  It wasn't necessarily books that I would read but the class discussions were great, it didn't even feel like a class.
The main reason that I really enjoyed this class though is because it is a little treat for myself in a world of business courses that I have to take.  This is my fun class and it was definitely that.

December 8, 2010

Fearing the Child

The idea of the child being something to fear is a compelling one. Usually when you think of children you think of innocence, not something to be weary of. I believe the idea of a child being "evil" is more feared than say an adult being evil is because it is the unexpected.
John Calhoun puts into very thoughtful words why Eli is so terribly frightening.
He says Eli “is a repository of adult fears about children, who are so like us yet in crucial ways so different, who are both vulnerable and demanding, and in touch with the id in ways that can elicit great anxiety and discomfort, especially when sexual stirrings begin to take form” (27).
I want to explore this passage more in depth because in so few words Calhoun is able to explain this age old fear. First off the part where he talks about a child being so like an adult but yet so different really brings up the reason we fear them adults fear them so much. If a child does something an adult can no way define it's frightening because all adults were once children. We should know or at least have an idea of what the child is all about. For a child to act in a way that is impossible for an adult to fathom is to make that child seem almost inhuman.
Next it seems very appropriate that Calhoun mentions Id. Freud had many theories about children an why they do what they do. He says that they are on their Id stage which basically means that children are for the most part selfish. This makes sense as to why Calhoun mentions the demands the child has.
Calhoun also mentions the difficulties for the child when they begin having sexual feelings. This statement also relates to Freud and his belief that all children have sexual feelings towards their parent of the opposite sex. This idea is often times disturbing to consider which could also make adults weary of children.
Overall Calhoun's essay had of fearing the child is intereting but also a completely founded idea.

December 1, 2010

Literary Citicism Essay

Vampire: The Hero?


So far all the books we have read as a class depict vampire as the predator; something for the reader to fear.  The closest we came to a sympathetic vampire character was Louis from Interview with a Vampire by Anne Rice.  The idea of the vampire being the heroine’s hero is an interesting one; an idea that is becoming vastly more popular as J.M. Tyree points out in his essay Warm-Blooded: True Blood and Let the Right One In.

Tyree’s essay discusses a number of important and notable qualities found in most vampire novels/movies/TV series.  He starts off by discussing the prevalence of politics in the recent upsurge of vampire movies.  The most notable, and his main focus, are hit TV show True Blood (2008) and movie Let the Right One In (2008).  True Bloods’ obvious political statements would be tolerance and acceptance. It is a good representation of the need for the acceptance of homosexuality. Tyree says “True Blood positions itself as a loose but obvious allegory about the mainstream acceptance of so-called ‘alternative lifestyles’- it’s about tolerance and integration of many kinds, using the vitriolic American debate over gay marriage as a touchstone, while linking it with the Southern reaction against civil rights.” (32)  Here Tyree is hinting at the importance of True Blood being set in the South, where civil rights and homosexuality are a much larger issue.  He is emphasizing that time and place are important for not only the setting of the story, but also when it was written.  This storyline would not have been possible, say 100 years earlier, because the issues were not yet relevant.  It simply would not have been thought of by the writer.  Tyree mentions books such as Dracula and Carmilla throughout the essay explaining that the issues in the books are relevant to their times.  They both also represent the “traditional vampire” as Tyree would call them.  He describes the role of the “traditional vampire” here:
            “Classically, being under the spell of a vampire involves effacement by seduction into an exploitative relationship between an omnisexual seducer and a parade of slave lovers – male and female – who are viewed as both interchangeable parts and as natural resources or blood banks.” (31)
His uses of the words “classically” and “traditionally” emphasize not only the changing vampire characters but also the changing of the times, issues and lifestyles.  This depiction of humans as objects instead of individuals was an issue when Dracula was written; mainly focusing on women but would also include minorities.  Carmilla may actually be considered modern for the period it was written in because even though the vampire Carmilla views her prey as   “self-replenishing bags of fresh blood” there is also feeling there between predator and prey, which Tyree describes as “cruel love.”
The “new” vampire is much different than these selfish, blood-crazed, monsters that we are used to.  For the most part Tyree focuses on the characters of Edward, Bill, and Eli (from Twilight, True Blood, and Let the Right One In) as the “new vampire” of our generation.  He says, “[They] embody a new combination of undead chum and unnaturally attentive lover, a sort of guardian angel with fangs.”  (32)  I think the main reason that this idea of the monster becoming the protector is because the innocent then seem special.  In all of these situations the vampire selects one human in which to lay their affections, as opposed to trying to protect a group of people.  They single out this human and seem to care very little about anyone else.  The idea is very romantic.  These days our society seems very taken with the idea of soul mates and true love.  Tyree asks a good question about today’s society.  “Does the new vampire, then, have the potential to stand in as a metaphor for our age’s fantasies of non-exploitative tolerance and relatively equitable love relationships?”  He is basically saying that what the majority of people desire today is a partner who accepts them exactly how they are and treats them fairly.  The question is whether or not this idea of the “perfect” someone is possible?  Or are people merely getting an unattainable idea in their head?
Tyree mentions in the essay that many times when a vampire is involved with a human it suggests pedophilia.  I found this such an interesting concept because in the examples that he gives, Twilight and True Blood, the humans are consenting adults when they get sexually involved with their vampire.  He doesn't touch on the subject too much but he brings up a really important point, one that is especially significant in Twilight.  The main character Bella wants to become a vampire, not only because she wants to be able to live forever like her love, Edward, but also because she does not want to grow old while he does not.  She is worried about her looks as well as how they would look together; an old woman with an apparently young man.  The reality is that Edward is about 91 years her senior.  Uh, kind of gross.  Edwards's age gap from Bella is never an issue though.  Why? Because Edward looks to be about the same age as Bella.  It is interesting that the couple looking the same age completely changes the perception of the situation; which is a 109 year old man dating and eventually marrying an 18 year old (not to mention the fact that he's a vampire).
The situation is practically the same in True Blood.  Bill, the vampire hero, and Sookie, the telepathic heroine, quickly become passionate lovers.  Bill is obviously from a different time with his southern courtliness and gentlemanly manners, but even though the age difference is right out there in the open for Sookie to experience, it never seems to bother her that she is dating someone who was born before the civil war.  These examples prove that looks are more important than the true age of the person.

Overall I agree with what Tyree says in his essay.  There are no overreaching statements that can be easily misunderstood and concepts that I had never thought of before are readily explained and supported.  For example, the idea of pedophilia being suggested in some vampire stories was one I had never considered, but it makes sense once you think about it.  He says "A genre featuring centuries-old characters attacking very young women sometimes clumsily evokes pedophilia…" (32)  I also liked his comparison of the traditional vampire, "…a false friend, the one whose magnetic personality and all-absorbing attentiveness turn out too good to be true, leading to an even lonelier place filled with life-draining abuse and manipulation." (37), and the new vampire, "(who)… aren't false friends.  What they truly desire most is something very different - they wish for an end to their interminable loneliness." (37) 

Questions:
1. Is the idea of the perfect someone possible?
2. Is the new vampire a result of changing political atmospheres or just a new, more risky love story?
3. What is the fascination with blood, sex and vampires?

Citations:
 1.        "Pedophilia." Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.,     23 11 2010 . Web. 1 Dec 2010.   <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia>.
2.        "Pansexuality." Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia. Wikimedia Foundation,  Inc., 01 12 2010 . Web. 1 Dec 2010. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pansexuality>.

November 24, 2010


The Final Project
Our class has focused and put a lot of emphasis on the perspective in which a story is told.  I don't think that anyone would argue that the character that is telling the story has a lot of influence in how the reader perceives it.  The idea of perspective is an important tool for the writer and if used properly can turn a good story into a great one.
For the finally project I want to focus on this idea of perspective and how, when a story is told from a different point of view, it can dramatically change the story for the reader.  In a previous blog I used one of Colleen's ideas to write a passage from Carmilla in the character Carmilla's perspective.  Obviously I will be using Carmilla as my book to do the final project.  In my previous blog I took an excerpt from the book and simply wrote it in Carmilla's perspective but I think for the project I will go further and add some scenes for Carmilla's character.  I am not sure which part of the story I will extend yet.  I'm excited about attempting this project but I just hope that I am able to do justice to Le Fanu's book because Carmilla was one of my favorite books this semester.

November 17, 2010

The End

I love the end of this book!  Anne Rice is realistic in the extreme; she holds nothing back and she doesn’t sugar coat it.  The end of Interview exemplifies all the typical fatal human flaws that Louis talks about throughout the whole book.  The boy’s response is classic.  How many people have listened to someone else describe their mistakes and thought, “If I were ever put in that position I would do things differently.”  It’s easy to think that after you’ve heard someone else’s mistake if you are ever encountered with the same issue you would be able to do it “right.”  The problem with this idea is that history repeats itself.  A person can be told repeatedly that something is wrong; often times they will choose to ignore it.
I think that the boy’s choice describes the type of person he is.  If you look at the characters of Lestat and Louis in a broad perspective they represent two different types of people; the types who live life to the fullest and embrace life and the types who believe all of their actions have consequences and continuously look back.  The boy’s decision that he wants to be a vampire shows that he is more like Lestat.  It also shows that the boy believes that he can live Louis’ life better than he did.  In reality, though, this is exactly what would happen.  Rice’s choice of the boy’s character is important.  He is young, na├»ve and impressionable.  If the interviewer had been a wise, old man would the end of the story have been believable?  Probably not.
What would my choice have been at the end?  Since the boy wasn’t even given a choice I can’t really look at it that way.  I don’t think I would have ever taken the initiative to ask.  Louis seems so depressed about his life of being a vampire that asking to be what he is would be downright insulting and Louis displays that insult and disappointment too.
            “’Give it to me!’ said the boy… ‘Make me a vampire now!’ he said as the vampire stared aghast.
What happened then was swift and confused, but it ended abruptly with the vampire on his feet holding the boy by the shoulders, the boy’s moist face contorted with fear, the vampire glaring at him in rage. ‘This is what you want?’ he whispered, his pale lips manifesting only the barest trace of movement.  ‘This… after all I’ve told you… is what you ask for?’”  (pg. 337)
I guess if I was in the situation the boy’s in I would probably think over exactly what Louis said.  If I still wanted to be turned into a vampire then I would try to find Lestat, the vampire far more likely to want to change me.

November 10, 2010

Warning:  I talk about parts in the book that the class hasn't gotten to yet!

Interview with a Vampire
The Book Vs. the Movie

We are reading Interview with a Vampire by Anne Rice this week.  Her book was published in 1974 and it was an instant classic.  Twenty years later it was released as a major motion picture and it created similar comments as the book.  Many would agree that overall the book and movie are very similar.  People expect parts of the book to be left out when adapted for a film; it is simply too difficult to fit every detail of the book into the movie.  While many of the scenes/events in the book and movie are similar I find that the biggest differences between the two lie in the characters.
I saw the movie Interview with a Vampire many times before I read the book and it has always been one of my favorites.  When I read the book, even though it follows along well with the movie, the characters came as quite a shock.  In the movie the three main characters, Louis, Lestat and Claudia, either have a somewhat unclear purpose or a different one altogether.  I want to explore those differences among the three characters in more detail.

Claudia
I would consider Claudia's character (played by Kirsten Dunst in the movie) to have transposed from book to movie the best.  The main difference I saw was that her purpose or reasoning behind her actions is much clearer in the book.  Towards the end of the book Claudia believes it is inevitable that Louis will leave her for the vampire Armand.  Claudia is so intuitive about people that she knows that Louis will leave before he does.  In the movie I do not get this impression that Louis will definitely leave.  Since there is question about that there is also question about why Claudia asks Louis to change Madeleine into a vampire.  Claudia says it's so she won't be alone, but it also seems like she does it to replace Lestat or to live through the new woman vampire vicariously.  This last part seems likely, also, because Claudia is forever stuck in a child's body.  Kirsten Dunst played this role of woman stuck in child's body admirably but I still think there is an issue of believability here.  The viewer still knows that it is a child pretending to be an adult.  Here is a clip from the movie where it is almost uncomfortable to watch the interactions between Kirsten Dunst and Brad Pitt because the viewer is aware that Dunst is just a young girl.

Louis
Louis' character, in my opinion, was much easier to understand in the book.  Throughout the movie Louis never seems happy.  He is a very dreary, depressing character.  We could attribute this to the losses Louis had as a human but it is never made apparent in the movie how much Louis hates being with Lestat.  These are Louis' thoughts of Lestat from the book Interview with a Vampire.
            "He appeared frail and stupid to me, a man made of dried twigs with a thin, carping voice…  But I stayed with him…  As I've told you, he had me at a great disadvantage.  He hinted there was much I didn't know and must know and that he alone could tell me." (pg. 34-35)
Here it is so glaringly obvious not only how disgusted Louis is by Lestat but also how much Lestat manipulates Louis to stay with him.  It emphasizes the loneliness in Lestat too.  Louis' disgust with Lestat does not exactly transfer into the movie.  In the movie what Louis seems to hate is Lestat's enjoyment of being a vampire.  This humanistic quality that Louis still carries seems to set him apart from other vampires in both the movie and book.  Since his condition (of being a vampire and therefore a murderer) is not exactly ideal for his feelings about humanity Louis never accepts what he is or embraces it the way Lestat does.
This is a clip from the movie emphasizing both Lestat's inhumanity and Louis's hatred of it.

Lestat
There were many people who had reservations about whether or not Tom Cruise would be able to pull off the character Lestat but after the movie was made he seemed to have everyone on his side, including the author herself, Anne Rice.  She comments about Tom Cruise's performance:
            ""ON TOM CRUISE: From the moment he appeared Tom was Lestat for me. He has the immense physical and moral presence; he was defiant and yet never without conscience; he was beautiful beyond description yet compelled to do cruel things. The sheer beauty of Tom was dazzling, but the polish of his acting, his flawless plunge into the Lestat persona, his ability to speak rather boldly poetic lines, and speak them with seeming ease and conviction were exhilarating and uplifting. The guy is great.

I'm no good at modesty. I like to believe Tom's Lestat will be remembered the way Olivier's Hamlet is remembered. Others may play the role some day but no one will ever forget Tom's version of it." (1)
Lestat's character in the book is far more admirable and captivating compared to the movie.  If the reader were referring to the book they would consider Louis to be the main character but if they were talking about the movie Lestat definitely gives Louis a run for his money.  Anne Rice makes Lestat seem so mindless in the book, like he is purely going on instinct and never thinks about what he does.  This excerpt from Interview with a Vampire highlights that quality in Lestat.
            "You see, they (young men) represented the greatest loss to Lestat, because they stood on the threshold of the maximum possibility of life.  Of course, Lestat didn't understand this himself.  I came to understand it.  Lestat understood nothing." (pg. 41)
Rice writes Lestat as a selfish  vampire who does not seem to care for anyone but himself.  He is truly vampire with no human qualities.  I also think that Louis' portrayals of Lestat turn the reader against him even more. The producer, David Gaffan, wanted Lestat to be played as "nasty", and I feel like he got the idea from the book because he truly is nasty.  Tom Cruise took Lestat to a whole different level.  You might even describe him as a "Byronic hero" or the hero that we love to hate.

Citations:
1.  Rice, Anne. "Anne Rice On Tom Cruise." Angelfire, Web. 10 Nov 2010.             <http://www.angelfire.com/ri/cerat/AnneOnTom.html>
2.  Rice, Anne. Interview with a Vampire. 1. New York: The Random House           Publishing Group, 1976. 34-35,41. Print.